“The particular characteristics of the Stars virus have been discovered. The virus is congruous and harmonious with the (computer) system and in the initial phase it does minor damage and might be mistaken for some executive files of government organizations.”
The report went on to blame Israel and the United States for the virus, as they did for the Stuxnet virus in early January. The Stuxnet virus, however, was not detected until it had infected nearly 80% of their system and had already caused major physical damage to the plant. The Stuxnet virus was able to take control of the plant, while simultaneously telling the plant’s monitoring staff that everything was fine. The virus caused 1,000 centrifuges to spin so fast that they broke before anyone even realized anything was wrong.
Nuclear enrichment facilities would be targeted by those concerned with Iran’s ability to create an atomic bomb. Enriched uranium provides fuel for nuclear power plants, which provide energy. Uranium enriched to a much higher degree, however, provides essential materials for nuclear weapons.
The Stuxnet virus is much too sophisticated to have been created by a simple hacker. Analysts have concluded that the virus could only have been created by a nation-state with intimate knowledge of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Although the United States and Israel have not admitted to the creation of the virus, the U.S. oversaw the creation of a simulation of Iran’s enrichment facility in a nuclear plant in southern Israel that used centrifuges identical to Iran’s.
So now I want your input. In an age of complicated diplomatic relations, when mandates and sanctions are not always effective tools for foreign policy, how should we view acts of cyber warfare against infrastructure? Should it be considered an act of war?
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/25/us-iran-computer-virus-idUSTRE73O1OL20110425